|
|
Post by Ariel on Jan 12, 2020 18:26:32 GMT
This explanation by Tom Montalk is the best description I have ever heard of how this reality works. This construct that we inhabit works on the same principles as a mirror. Our reality gives us feedback not based on what we want, but who we are at the core of our being. Everyone can benefit from listening to this explanation.
The Law of Attraction
|
|
|
|
Post by sahib on Jan 12, 2020 19:07:53 GMT
This explanation by Tom Montalk is the best description I have ever heard of how this reality works. This construct that we inhabit works on the same principles as a mirror. Our reality gives us feedback not based on what we want, but who we are at the core of our being. Everyone can benefit from listening to this explanation. The Law of AttractionThank you Ariel for this video, it is very clear and enlightening to watch. I really love this video. It explains many issues people might have and it gives us tools to reflect upon. There was one screen picture I found so revealing, I made a screenshot to put it as a wallpaper on my desktop to remind me every time I look at my desktop screen. As a kind of 'mantra' to express every minute of my life. ( see attachment) Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by vitalinfo on Jan 13, 2020 16:47:08 GMT
After watching this video I asked myself what it is that determines our core level of consciousness.
I tend to think it is the trauma's we have accumulated over our life span that can keep us down.
There are other factors but they seem less significant to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by H H on Jan 14, 2020 14:00:20 GMT
I liked the video too. However in this construct does it really apply that what we truly "are" as a being is what the universe becomes and brings to you?
Or would that only apply in a non-En.ki construct?
|
|
|
|
Post by vitalinfo on Jan 14, 2020 16:44:41 GMT
I liked the video too. However in this construct does it really apply that what we truly "are" as a being is what the universe becomes and brings to you? Or would that only apply in a non-En.ki construct? I tend to think it does apply to this construct although we here have much more difficulty projecting what we want due to the artificial soul (fake self) being in the way. Reconnecting with our true self seems to be the only answer. Reconnection is probably the wrong term to use here as what we think we are is fake. What we really are is the base ball in stead of the tennis ball and the marbel to use the example of Wes. The latter ones being the fake self. We don't want to reconnect the fake self with the true self. That would be silly. The fake self is not us. It is an overlay that we need to get rid off. Only by becoming more and more aware of our thrue self we will be able to project what we want better and better. Isn't that just fantastic!!! The thought alone fills me with joy. |
|
|
|
Post by Ariel on Jan 14, 2020 18:00:53 GMT
I liked the video too. However in this construct does it really apply that what we truly "are" as a being is what the universe becomes and brings to you? Or would that only apply in a non-En.ki construct? Yes, that's the way it works within this experiment/construct. Because this construct is part of a Greater Universe (KHAA), we can conclude that this is the way it works "out there", as well. This construct is a drop of water from a much larger ocean. What is in the drop of water is also in the ocean. En.ki doesn't manifest the laws for creation, he only manipulates what already exists. This means that the process of creating reality doesn't come from him, it comes from us and our connection to the Universe. He can't stop us from creating, in other words. So...it must be a quality of the Greater Universe which is manipulated by the attachment of false programs, limited frequency perception, and overlays to our vehicle/avatar ( -- and trauma is the consequence of all that) within this construct. We are manipulated to create reality in a way which is beneficial to them rather than us. We are sub-consciously creating. We can turn that around, though, as mentioned in this video. Hope that makes sense. This is my understanding of it, at this point. |
|
|
|
Post by blue18 on Jan 18, 2020 21:28:23 GMT
Thank you so much Ariel for sharing the Tom Montalk’s video on Soul Resonance and Law of Attraction. Not so long ago Tom, along with 3 other enlightened men did a roundtable discussion “ Decoders of Truth” discussing the higher self, the golden age, spiritual authenticity, applying quantum physics in our lives, fake reality, and the Matrix trilogy.
Here is the summary:
Join Jay Campbell, Tom Montalk, Nick Hinton, Jake Parsons and Kent Nichols for amind altering conversation covering the following topics:
***Plant Medicine-Is it a Gateway for Everyone or only those of the right vibration?
***Quantum Physics-How do we utilize its principles to live a level 10 life within the Matrix?
***Connecting with Your Higher Self-How do you do it?
***Reincarnation and True Spirituality-What is legit from Abrahamic and all Human Created Religions (if anything)?
***The Dialectic-Defining the Sides of the 'War in Heaven' -Seraphim (non human-Reptilian Angels) vs Kerubim (Proto-Human) Is there any way to define who is aligned with what (socio politically).
***Was the Matrix Trilogy the Golden Cipher for those with Eyes2C and Ears2Hear? Agent Smith with Morpheus, Neo with The Architect in Revolutions
***Can We Manifest the Golden Age in the next 2-3 years?
It confirms/reinforce a lot of things that have been discussed here in this forum.
The only difference is at the end of the discussion, they give a very promising future/outcome that we can manifest a golden age by using the creativity within us instead of exiting the matrix.
While to me personally, I believe I have had enough of the experiences here and willing to leave when it is my time. But thinking about others, especially family members, friends and many beautiful souls here who are still sleeping, do they stand a chance? Can we really make a difference to lifting the cover a little more and together manifesting a future WE want? At the mean time, is it a risk that will keep us here unnecessarily?
|
|
|
|
Post by dragnfly on Jan 23, 2020 1:06:42 GMT
I agree Ariel, this is excellent. Tom has outdone himself.
|
|
|
|
Post by grateful1 on Mar 14, 2020 15:03:26 GMT
8 minutes well said from a famous physician
|
|
|
|
Post by grateful1 on Mar 18, 2020 15:05:23 GMT
Rudolf Steiner: Virus - the facts
|
|
|
|
Post by H H on Apr 20, 2020 22:53:09 GMT
Good short video to send to those that are "asleep". Title: [URGENT] This May Be One Of The Most Important Videos On Youtube - channel: Video Advice
Full video is here:
|
|
|
|
Post by Ariel on May 24, 2020 16:28:51 GMT
Woke up to this inspirational video in my email inbox. What a beautiful and very appropriate message for all of us, right now. Thank you, Lorna  |
|
|
|
Post by sahib on May 24, 2020 20:06:52 GMT
Woke up to this inspirational video in my email inbox. What a beautiful and very appropriate message for all of us, right now. Thank you, Lorna “The privilege of a lifetime is being who you are” (Joseph Campbell) I thought this was a nice movie with a very nice message. However, it is only a manual for one lifetime, a manual to create a successful life. It is NOT a manual to discover who and what I really am, it doesn't bring me much knowledge and insight into my inner self. But after watching this video I did have a very nice feeling, I reviewed everything I have done in my life and also what I have NOT done, things I have learned to become who I am now. But it did not give me a deeper insight into myself, there is an entirely different MANUAL for that. |
|
|
|
Post by Ariel on Aug 3, 2020 23:47:59 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by sahib on Jan 7, 2021 21:52:50 GMT
Have any of you watched the latest videos of 'Ankaraman'? As far as I know he’s got permission from Wes to use info from the WPP in his videos. He now uses the pseudonym ‘Wake Up Craft’ and I’ve discovered he's interpreting information from the book ‘Alien Interview’ by Mathilda McElroy versus the Wes Penre Papers. This book ‘Alien Interview’ has been discussed sometime earlier on this forum. He has some interesting explanations of the info from the ‘Alien Interview’ book which he connects with the WPP information. He has several videos about this subject already. What do you think about his interpretations? ALIEN INTERVIEW versus WES PENRE PAPERS His personal YT page is : www.youtube.com/c/Ankaraman/videos |
|
|
|
Post by Wes Penre on Jan 8, 2021 0:28:25 GMT
Have any of you watched the latest videos of 'Ankaraman'? As far as I know he’s got permission from Wes to use info from the WPP in his videos. He now uses the pseudonym ‘Wake Up Craft’ and I’ve discovered he's interpreting information from the book ‘Alien Interview’ by Mathilda McElroy versus the Wes Penre Papers. This book ‘Alien Interview’ has been discussed sometime earlier on this forum. He has some interesting explanations of the info from the ‘Alien Interview’ book which he connects with the WPP information. He has several videos about this subject already. What do you think about his interpretations? ALIEN INTERVIEW versus WES PENRE PAPERS His personal YT page is : www.youtube.com/c/Ankaraman/videosThere are certain similarities between the Alien Interview and the WPP--I agree. I don't know where that info comes from, but there are a few red flags in general when it comes to the Alien Interview: 1. Lawrence R. Spencer, who wrote the book, said that the name of the woman who communicated with the ET was Mathilda MacElroy. Elroy is very similar to L. Ron (Hubbard). 2. There is a part of the interview where the ET talks about what happened 75 million years ago and 4 quadrillion years ago. This is directly copied from L. Ron Hubbard's OT 3 material, which I have completed, so I know it firsthand. It's a direct rip-off. 3. The author of the book admitted in an interview in the early 2000s, I think it was, that he is an ex-Scientologist. That interview is probably still on YouTube. Not everything Hubbard said was incorrect--there are some indicators that he was either channeling, remote viewing, or used automatic handwriting. I suspect all of the above. He is the grandfather of remote viewing. All the first military remote viewers were ex-Scientologist and had learned it from Hubbard. The famous sf writer, A.E. van Vogt, who helped Hubbard build the first Scientology Organization, but later defected from the organization, went on record saying that he caught Hubbard in his office being completely "out of it," and he could only see the white part of his eyes. He was in some kind of trance, apparently. Anyway, there are too many similarities to Scientology, although not everything in the book is a Scientology rip-off. Who knows where the author got the rest of his info. I don't... |
|
|
|
Post by sahib on Jan 8, 2021 16:37:44 GMT
Have any of you watched the latest videos of 'Ankaraman'? As far as I know he’s got permission from Wes to use info from the WPP in his videos. He now uses the pseudonym ‘Wake Up Craft’ and I’ve discovered he's interpreting information from the book ‘Alien Interview’ by Mathilda McElroy versus the Wes Penre Papers. This book ‘Alien Interview’ has been discussed sometime earlier on this forum. He has some interesting explanations of the info from the ‘Alien Interview’ book which he connects with the WPP information. He has several videos about this subject already. What do you think about his interpretations? ALIEN INTERVIEW versus WES PENRE PAPERS His personal YT page is : www.youtube.com/c/Ankaraman/videosThere are certain similarities between the Alien Interview and the WPP--I agree. I don't know where that info comes from, but there are a few red flags in general when it comes to the Alien Interview: 1. Lawrence R. Spencer, who wrote the book, said that the name of the woman who communicated with the ET was Mathilda MacElroy. Elroy is very similar to L. Ron (Hubbard). 2. There is a part of the interview where the ET talks about what happened 75 million years ago and 4 quadrillion years ago. This is directly copied from L. Ron Hubbard's OT 3 material, which I have completed, so I know it firsthand. It's a direct rip-off. 3. The author of the book admitted in an interview in the early 2000s, I think it was, that he is an ex-Scientologist. That interview is probably still on YouTube. Not everything Hubbard said was incorrect--there are some indicators that he was either channeling, remote viewing, or used automatic handwriting. I suspect all of the above. He is the grandfather of remote viewing. All the first military remote viewers were ex-Scientologist and had learned it from Hubbard. The famous sf writer, A.E. van Vogt, who helped Hubbard build the first Scientology Organization, but later defected from the organization, went on record saying that he caught Hubbard in his office being completely "out of it," and he could only see the white part of his eyes. He was in some kind of trance, apparently. Anyway, there are too many similarities to Scientology, although not everything in the book is a Scientology rip-off. Who knows where the author got the rest of his info. I don't... There are many ex-Scientologists who are now on the path of awakening and received Gnosis thanks to their past in Scientology. Like so many, like myself, who have tried to find their way deep into Christian doctrine, and have finally found Gnosis. Our entire past is merely the "stepping-stone" to the purpose for which we entered this life cycle, ultimately completing our development as a soul/spirit in these lower realms. Actually, we should disconnect the information from our 'stepping stones' from the 'movement' in which they exist. Because a lot of information might contain a ‘truth’ which wasn’t well understood in that 'movement'. Let us not make the mistake of throwing away 'pearls of wisdom and knowledge' which can be useful in our next step in the development towards the 'ultimate' redemption of these lower realms. This of course also applies to a lot of Christian information. Of course, this does not mean that we don't renounce information that no longer supports our truth. This is how I deal with this.... |
|
|
|
Post by Wes Penre on Jan 8, 2021 19:31:01 GMT
There are certain similarities between the Alien Interview and the WPP--I agree. I don't know where that info comes from, but there are a few red flags in general when it comes to the Alien Interview: 1. Lawrence R. Spencer, who wrote the book, said that the name of the woman who communicated with the ET was Mathilda MacElroy. Elroy is very similar to L. Ron (Hubbard). 2. There is a part of the interview where the ET talks about what happened 75 million years ago and 4 quadrillion years ago. This is directly copied from L. Ron Hubbard's OT 3 material, which I have completed, so I know it firsthand. It's a direct rip-off. 3. The author of the book admitted in an interview in the early 2000s, I think it was, that he is an ex-Scientologist. That interview is probably still on YouTube. Not everything Hubbard said was incorrect--there are some indicators that he was either channeling, remote viewing, or used automatic handwriting. I suspect all of the above. He is the grandfather of remote viewing. All the first military remote viewers were ex-Scientologist and had learned it from Hubbard. The famous sf writer, A.E. van Vogt, who helped Hubbard build the first Scientology Organization, but later defected from the organization, went on record saying that he caught Hubbard in his office being completely "out of it," and he could only see the white part of his eyes. He was in some kind of trance, apparently. Anyway, there are too many similarities to Scientology, although not everything in the book is a Scientology rip-off. Who knows where the author got the rest of his info. I don't... There are many ex-Scientologists who are now on the path of awakening and received Gnosis thanks to their past in Scientology. Like so many, like myself, who have tried to find their way deep into Christian doctrine, and have finally found Gnosis. Our entire past is merely the "stepping-stone" to the purpose for which we entered this life cycle, ultimately completing our development as a soul/spirit in these lower realms. Actually, we should disconnect the information from our 'stepping stones' from the 'movement' in which they exist. Because a lot of information might contain a ‘truth’ which wasn’t well understood in that 'movement'. Let us not make the mistake of throwing away 'pearls of wisdom and knowledge' which can be useful in our next step in the development towards the 'ultimate' redemption of these lower realms. This of course also applies to a lot of Christian information. Of course, this does not mean that we don't renounce information that no longer supports our truth. This is how I deal with this.... Exactly! That's a very good point that I've always tried to adopt in my own research. I like the meme, "don't throw out the baby with the bathwater." That's also how I have tackled my old Scientology experiences. I did almost everything that was available in Scn at the time--both theoretically and in practice--and it would be quite arrogant of me to say that everything I learned there was nonsense. It was not. I took things away from it that have proven very helpful and fruitful in my continuous life and research, while there were other parts that I couldn't/can't relate to at all, and which doesn't fit in with anything I've encountered since. So, it's really a matter of sorting the wheat from the chaff. This goes for any information, IMO. It's okay to discard all of something, as well, if that's how we feel, but there are often at least one or two gold nuggets somewhere in there... |
|
